Seller's Responses to Property Disclosure Document
Amy Fennell • August 14, 2017
Louisiana law requires residential sellers to complete to the best of their knowledge a "property disclosure document" detailing the condition of the property being sold.[1] Most residential sellers complete the property disclosure document form prepared by the Louisiana Real Estate Commission ("property disclosure document" or PDD). A recent Louisiana case calls into question how sellers should respond to the PDD questions.
1. BACKGROUND OF CASE
In Valobra v. Nelson, the buyer sued the seller alleging the seller misrepresented the condition of the property by checking the "no" box on the PDD instead of the "no knowledge" box as to questions regarding the condition of the property.[2] The buyers allege because of this misrepresentation by the sellers on the PDD, the buyers agreed to buy the property "as is" and waive redhibition rights in the Act of Sale. Redhibition is a warranty required by state law to be given to a buyer unless waived by the buyer. Redhibition means the buyer can sue to return the property to the seller or get a refund of a portion of the purchase price after the sale if the buyer discovers a defect in the property that if the buyer had known about prior to the sale he would not have bought the property.[3] The Valobra buyers alleged that the sellers checked the box marked "no" in response to questions on the PDD regarding whether the property had certain defects. Defects in the property were later discovered. The sellers then claimed they did not know of the defects in the property.[4] The buyers argued that the sellers checking the box marked "no" instead of the box marked "no knowledge" on the PDD and therefore intentionally misled the buyers into believing that the sellers had knowledge that there were no defects in the property. The buyers alleged the sellers were in bad faith and fraudulently induced the sellers to execute a waiver of redhibition contained in the Act of Sale by stating "no" instead of "no knowledge" of the defects.[5]
2. LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT ANALYSIS
In Valobra, the Louisiana Supreme began its analysis by citing Louisiana Revised Statutes § 9:3198(B)(1): "The seller shall complete the property disclosure document in good faith to the best of the seller's belief and knowledge . . . If the seller has no knowledge or information required by the disclosure document, the seller shall so indicate on the disclosure statement and shall be in compliance with this Chapter (emphasis supplied)."[6]
The Supreme Court held that the buyers need not prove the sellers had "actual knowledge" of the defect to bring the suit.[7] The Court declared that the "[p]laintiffs (buyers) have stated a cause of action to challenge the validity of the waiver (of redhibition),"—fraud—and "are entitled to litigate this threshold issue..."[8] The Court seems to imply that when sellers check "no," the sellers are representing the property does not have a certain defect and when sellers check "no knowledge," the sellers are merely not aware of the defect.
The Valobra decision is limited in its application due to the fact that what was before the Court was to determine the buyers had effectively stated a cause of action to challenge the validity of the waiver and were entitled to move forward with the litigation.[9] The Supreme Court returned the case to the trial court level and the litigation is ongoing.[10] The Court has not rendered a final decision on whether or not the Valobra buyers were misled.
3. THE LOUISIANA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION
The Valobra decision highlights a need to protect sellers from inadvertently subjecting themselves to claims for fraudulent misrepresentation and protect buyers from misinterpretation of the information provided by sellers. The Louisiana Real Estate Commission is considering this issue and may provide additional clarity for a seller's disclosures through changes to the PDD.
4. CONCLUSION
The Valobra Court's holding is a word of caution for sellers to closely consider their responses to the PDD. Sellers should consider refraining from checking the box marked "no" for any inquiry regarding defects in the property unless the seller actually has knowledge that the property does not have the property defect. The Court's decision indicates that the improper completion of the document can create a cause of action of fraud against the seller. The practical consequence of Valobra is that sellers should mark "no knowledge" regarding property defects if the sellers lack knowledge as to whether there are such defects in the property.
DISCLAIMER
These materials are to be used for informational purposes and should not be construed as specific legal advice. These materials are not designed to cover every aspect of a legal situation for every factual circumstance that may arise regarding the subject matter included.
This publication is for reference purposes only and association members or other readers are responsible for contacting their own attorneys or other professional advisors for legal or contract advice. The comments provided herein solely represent the opinions of the authors and is not a guarantee of interpretation of the law or contracts by any court or by the Louisiana Real Estate Commission.
[1] La. R.S. 9:3198 et seq.
[2] Valobra, 136 So.3d (La. 2013)
[3] La. Civil Code 2520
[4] Id.
[5] Id.
[6] Id.
[7] Id.
[8] Id.
[9] Id.
[10] In another recent case, Louapre v. Booher, 2016 WL 4555716 (La. App. 4th 2016) the court distinguishes Valobra in deciding whether to grant summary judgment.
The National Association of REALTORS® Board of Directors approved a 2026 budget with no dues increase and passed a Professional Standards Recommendation to clarify language in NAR Code of Ethics Standard of Practice 10-5, which prohibits harassment of any person or persons protected under Article 10 of the Code. A day earlier, the Executive Committee approved another Professional Standards change, revising language for Policy Statement 29 designed to ensure state and local associations can fairly and consistently enforce the Code of Ethics. Learn more about the changes. Read the revised Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice. Board members also approved a consent agenda to elect the 2026 officers and regional vice presidents . Christine Hansen of Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., was elected 2026 President-Elect, and Colin Mullane of Ashland, Ore. was elected 2026 First Vice President. The meeting opened with a video message from President Donald Trump, who welcomed REALTORS® to Washington and thanked them for support of the House-passed tax reform. NAR routinely invites the U.S. president to address REALTORS® at the Washington meetings. Over NAR's history, nine sitting presidents have addressed the association. Board Actions Approved a series of Finance Committee recommendations, accepting the association’s financial statement, approving the 2026 operating and advocacy budgets, and keeping dues at $156. The board actions also redirect $35 of the $45 Consumer Advertising Campaign assessment to operating funds. This change positions NAR to make its next settlement payment in February 2026 and maintain a balanced budget without raising total dues. The remaining $10 for the Consumer Advertising Campaign will fund optimized, metrics-driven activities that reach and engage consumers in critical markets. NAR CEO Nykia Wright and President Kevin Sears explained the shift at the opening session of the conference . Amended Standard of Practice 10-5 to give state and local associations greater clarity in how to fairly and consistently enforce Article 10 of the Code of Ethics. The amended Standard of Practice says that REALTORS®, in their capacity as real estate professionals, in association with their real estate businesses, or in their real estate-related activities, shall not harass any person or persons based on race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, national origin, sexual orientation, or gender identity. Made a series of recommendations to the Standards of Practice to bring the language in line with the terms of NAR’s 2024 settlement. Approved a motion to make one member of the Executive Committee a commercial practitioner who has served as chair, vice chair or liaison of an NAR commercial-related committee or forum to serve a two-year term and be independent of the 10% commercial representation requirement outlined in the NAR Constitution. Approved a recommendation from the Credentials and Campaign Rules Committee to amend qualifications for president-elect, first vice president and treasurer effective Jan. 1, 2026. Qualifications for top-line officers are now aligned with those already in place for regional vice presidents. Approved recommendations from the Member Accountability Committee related to applications for volunteer leadership and the Statement of Appropriate Event Conduct. The goal of the recommendations is to ensure members found in violation of the NAR Member Code of Conduct are properly disclosed. Award Winners NAR President Kevin Sears announced the 2025 Distinguished Service Award winners James P. Cormier , AHWD, C2EX, of Minneapolis-St. Paul, and Brooke S. Hunt , AHWD, E-PRO, SFR, SRS, C2EX , of Flower Mound, Texas. In addition, the group recognized the winner of the 2024 William R. Magel Award, Anne Marie DeCatsye , CEO of the Canopy REALTOR® Association and Canopy MLS in the Charlotte, N.C., metro area. REALTORS® Relief Foundation During the meeting, REALTORS® Relief Foundation President Greg Hrabcak appealed to board members to make a tax-deductible donation. The fund provides housing assistance to victims in the immediate aftermath of a disaster; 100% of funds donated go to disaster relief. “We’ve had devastating wildfires in California, tornadoes in Missouri and Kentucky and flooding in West Virginia, and we’re still in the first half of this year,” Hrabcak said. Before the meeting ended, directors had donated more than $41,000.
Whether you’re working in Baton Rouge, Shreveport, Lafayette, or anywhere in between, here’s how you can use Homeownership Month to elevate your real estate marketing and better serve your community.
Here are key insights and ready-to-use talking points to show your clients how homeownership is more than just a place to live—it's a smart strategy for long-term wealth building, especially right here in our state.
